BORROW
copyrighted work
SFGTV
September 25, 2010 3:00am-3:30am PST on SFGTV

0 comments
Clips viewed 37 times

Broadcast Summary

00:00
road stop advocating law full cars ride side sign share stops allow change slowdown sensible complete possible whenever solution everybody motorists recognizes differently frequently behind bicyclist
00:30
never run law sign four size fits stop line turn road guess slows every light courteously times middle behind riding rolled entire safely enforce sidewalk important concluding cyclists process people red
01:00
mar behavior rolling bicycle morning stop maxwell advisory unfairly capacity address chu dangerous chairperson supervisors sign point really thank commissioner district
01:30
forward plan bike colleagues coalition really working interim looking fact director moving essentially supervisors pd echo mta sf board mentioned
02:00
friendly forward san mar lot move bike hope user bill road roads thank really moving making cycling sharing livable francisco pedestrian increasing chairperson education beautiful plan
02:30
recommendation finding public discussed colleagues move best speak anyone enough closed comment else discussion discuss let quickly
03:00
response jury grand departments chu bike plan often civil speak answer general getting amending findings provided questions diligence responded understand supervisor recommendations colleagues report
03:30
plan bike mta bicycle fund five path last mean years smith amend adopt sfmta every option budget adopted department implications recommendations response view point
04:00
plan together put next bike due san bite long years start state within things funded scheduled process another affairs project context francisco adapt
04:30
environmental plan incorporated fit review survey process numbers planned locations adapting every improvements developments recommendations lot last bike point begin expensive
05:00
schedule chu lot cost done city bike took point years understanding plant spend lifted review complete changing involved analysis expensive injunction definitely significant supervisor locations three
05:30
process review plan went projects part ceqa meant three delaying bike develop environmental change lot planning
06:00
review process answering confident questions environmental next finish budget action bicycle implemented additional comes forward kill feel along plan
06:30
findings bike plan around enforcement law need city able jury major plans civil grand rules areas adopt topics things action outside traffic putting supervisor understand components possibility immediately chu wanted educational
07:00
bike plan mta able many seems staff reach along adopt exists stated member moving report factors outside details forward covered earlier believe actually absolutely recommended potentially enforcement education additional brought
07:30
engineering portion enforcement office education success safety process measure created traffic basis particularly responsibility recommendations call view threes supervisors
08:00
enforcement success portion education bike cooperating number working taken monitoring document plant measured together traffic participating living track years considering
08:30
fully accidents rates terms try keeping regards measure accident participate chu statistics amend supervisor successful practical bike rate plan enforcement extensive
09:00
citations tracking generally basis daily fine fines issued records traffic collisions violations problematic recover tell able many seen officers
09:30
providing speed trying resulted terms fines keeping left company traffic mta tracking saturday everything last material fault part 2006 specific
10:00
collisions chu complete citations supervisor technology committee track right retract present incidents ok able data statistics
10:30
findings mar lax size help fits king view often point susan raised defending chairperson unless couple curious improve feeling advisory approach response questions committee something enforcement safety mentioned public
11:00
perception lax often comment important heavy somewhere lacks sure medium handed middle educated participate someplace
11:30
point view four together different perspectives standing accident bicycles happened something officer education cooperate each corners helps better pedestrian
12:00
registration chu lot help bike jury town bikes since perceptions people office looked process onerous weekends question advocate something citations curiosity supervisor bicycling grand contacted
12:30
respond ask jim chu mar bicycles jury civil staff grand issue folks maybe talked chairperson little policy report wanted common quickly growing bit prepared register wondering supervisor remember member
13:00
looked licensing fee code area jury start state davis found choose allows process provide program traffic stickers berkeley including individual california jurisdictions materials programs limited
13:30
bicycle little attached three years per lasts attach program revenue 12 licenses stickers feet impractical license bit pay readable
14:00
impractical 12 top recommend law year find three state registration within limits expectg maximum operate confines something currently supervisor california necessarily enforcement generation chu saying
14:30
advisory city looked bicycle committee mr san mar hill right bikes every world leave volume tourist greatest community thousands additional chairperson francisco given
15:00
registration city burn difficult stolen bikes burden establish looked else pretty benefit rigorously everything logistically system davis basis forth bicyclist
15:30
licensing discussed bicycles issue sfmta asked types people last vehicle confusion code addressed california bring topic board seems state respondents previous
16:00
bicycle useful sort party third recovering 12 cost shows cases cover aiding limited hubbard program however internet somewhat services programs registration administering stolen
16:30
another age city able fire sense state local level police bicyclists stolen bicycle parents worried national bicycles remember something databases department registries recovering encourage licensing search
17:00
practical bicycle service lived stopped question driver actually bicycles registering moved licensing providing bicyclists berkeley license lists carry people california cyclists
17:30
state city people lot code live ride major local power beyond change cycling license enforce require entering bicycles districts impractical disincentive california something serve
18:00
helpful chu mar goes ones data list major chairperson board sfmta comes awhile reasons provide district concerns prepared practical supervisor pursuing every question
18:30
value appreciate start really tone title safer brings moving report making sharing everyone findings roadways conflict dialogue important conversation questions colleagues streets
19:00
conflict board finding police approved together issues approve thinking among cyclists mistrust motorists recommendation anger burke response
19:30
san mta road raise clear agree proper police respond conduct suggestion sharing tensions response mistrust roadways adopting francisco education agreement dangerous department continues bicyclists misperception campaigns reading
20:00
mayor plan response bac 2011 jury hold among civil grand amend police submit riders bicycle transit amended address objection without january cyclists meetings adopting different attitudes pedestrians recommendation motorists hostile
20:30
recommend bike plan amending disagree recommendation implications perhaps practical technical partially supervisor may hearing chu let open respond disagreement
21:00
supervisor without objection chairperson issues bicycle advisory thorough entities response committee appreciated needs coordination mar agree mta anti acceptable
21:30
responses partial response education disagreement chu non key goal gets looks number police cyclists bicycles material language extensive motorists systematic distribution agreement mayor
22:00
materials reach targeted education agreement sfmta exist plan aspect create public bicycle committee replaced sfpd currently
22:30
perhaps mta however chu sfpd buses three flyer agree groups funding efforts request response provides provided specific education currently available responses campaigns partially materials department distribution incorporating supervisor information targeted
23:00
bike non hand terms modes fairly robust school program transportation believe finding members cyclists provided segments probably outreach motorists materials bicyclists distribution different community certain
23:30
job groups bac maybe agree number things better couple others equally getting adequate reaching response programs motorists partially materials incorporate educational distributed systematically information understand message
24:00
something idea else buses education ad mar aunt chairperson agreed little fliers equally talking whether without pamphlet replaced material adopting objection campaigns distribute educational categories leaflet
24:30
materials cycling education distribute six deal much week jury response safe last civil grand dealt agree public easier bicycle program tsunami pension advisory cyclists findings read laughter recommendation committee report
25:00
cyclists non dmv mta bike test plan mayor stores videos flyers program correspondentce drivers include believe campaign provides changing response replaced education pamphlets implemented recommendation educating already billboard
25:30
implemented plan bicycle corporate provides amended advisory saying material disagree feasible educational distribution amend start plant another already agreement
26:00
educational saying committee incorporate chu bac bike part bursa raise agree versus bicycle program purpose advisory amending probably disagree response programs materials recommendation supervisor awareness perhaps
26:30
training materials police 2b mar plan date peace goals center actions finding include officer relevant question language objection standards commission information chairperson california objectives without
27:00
police agree objectives training relative adoption academy response referred suggested date department irrelevant sound recommendation plans materials improve goals safety amendments
27:30
mta chu response supervisor disagreement police given bicycle created planned improve cyclists urban coordination nine action items includes regarding
28:00
police recommendation academy materials mar 2011 plan post update halpern related without develop january officers adoption training referred objection distribute consideration conjunction supervisor trained
28:30
without adopt police agreement may item aware sound moving having maxwell academy officers adoption response insurance objection responses advantage liability department recommendation recommended supervisor cyclists
29:00
plan supervisor add chu next bike train maybe formal provide written amended perhaps indicate amendment insurance currently department bicyclists liability conversation advantages information maxwell
29:30
police plan listed supervisor 2d 113 mar next bike jury among grand great people public section finding officer success without included critical objection suggestion pedestrians acknowledgments involvement writers

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)